<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gabriel Harper's Blog &#187; paid links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gabrielharper.com/tag/paid-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gabrielharper.com</link>
	<description>Business, Web Sites and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PageRank Means Nothing (See For Yourself&#8230;)</title>
		<link>http://www.gabrielharper.com/2009/04/pagerank-means-nothing-see-for-yourself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gabrielharper.com/2009/04/pagerank-means-nothing-see-for-yourself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scripts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmaster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gabrielharper.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just compared Google referrals to PageRank on 37 different Websites, and here are the results. The numbers are pretty amazing. If PageRank does mean anything, it certainly doesn&#8217;t mean good search performance&#8230; Since I&#8217;ve been working like crazy on new code for my SEO scripts and upcoming phpLinkBid release, it wasn&#8217;t that tough to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gabrielharper.com/2009/04/pagerank-means-nothing-see-for-yourself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google No Longer Suggests Relevant Links</title>
		<link>http://www.gabrielharper.com/2008/10/google-no-longer-suggests-relevant-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gabrielharper.com/2008/10/google-no-longer-suggests-relevant-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gabrielharper.com/blog/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s Webmaster Guidelines no longer suggests having relevant sites link to yours. They also removed their suggestion of submitting your site to relevant directories. This was brought up in Google Groups recently, and subsequently on the big Webmaster forums Digital-Point and Sitepoint. However based on the logic of these threads, which get pretty heated over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gabrielharper.com/2008/10/google-no-longer-suggests-relevant-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

